 |
Time for a Change?
By Jackson Baker
FEBRUARY 2, 1998:
Remember Gerald Ford? The president of a generation back
who, predecessor Lyndon Johnson once said, couldnt walk and chew gum at the
same time?
Ford came off as an endearingly bumbling
figure, whether he was forgetting that a Soviet bloc existed in a televised debate or
falling down stairs in one of those frequent mishaps of his that, comically re-enacted on
TVs Saturday Night Live by Chevy Chase, made both Chase and SNL staples of
baby-boomer America.
There was always more to Ford than that
image, but it stuck, and, while in a sense it augured poorly for his historical reputation
and, along with his pardon of his presidential predecessor, Richard Nixon, helped to
defeat him for reelection in 1976, it was one of the reasons he got to be president in the
first place.
Few people doubted Nixons
intelligence or even his competence as a chief executive, but the Watergate scandal, with
its revelations of presidentially authorized break-ins, wiretappings, and enemies lists,
confirmed what had long been suspected of the self-made man from Whittier, California
that his character belonged to the dark side of American life.
Hence, a perceived national need to escape
from tragedy into the sitcom dimensions personified by Ford and the rest of his family
wholesome and middle-of-the-road but still within hailing distance of the social
changes then going on in post-Vietnam America. For such reasons did the political
Establishment in Washington, both Democratic and Republican, force Ford upon Nixon as a
vice-presidential replacement to the disgraced (and highly partisan) Spiro Agnew, driven
from office by his own revealed corruptions.
After Nixons resignation in 1974,
Ford served the countrys purposes well enough until successors emerged first,
in the person of Democratic outsider Jimmy Carter, then in the Hollywood-style presidency
of Republican Ronald Reagan.
Flash forward to the present day when,
fresh from a resounding reelection and standing high in the polls like Richard
Nixon when Watergate broke in 1973 Democratic presidential incumbent Bill Clinton
seems to have found himself tripped up by the consequences of his own long-suspected
flaws.
Though Clintons philandering nature
has often been compared to that of John F. Kennedy, it is likely that he has more in
common with another would-be JFK clone, former U.S. Senator Gary Hart, who was forced to
abandon his own presidential campaign in 1987 after being found to have committed some
sexual monkey business aboard a yacht of that name and at various points elsewhere on the
compass. Unlike the genuinely lustful JFK, both Clinton and Hart seem, frankly, to have
been working too hard at establishing an image of themselves as studs. And the difference
shows.
Priapic, people called Kennedy,
but its hard to make that adjective work as a descriptor for Clinton, a man whose
sexual ambitions seem largely inclined to the domain of oral sex. (Try explaining that
predilection to a school-age child.) And, granted, the now-vindicated Gennifer Flowers may
not have been the bimbo we thought she was, but Paula Jones (whose own story looks better
and better) is undeniably a skank, her $24,000 makeover notwithstanding. And Monica
Lewinsky? A 21-year-old intern? Come on, Mr. President!
It may be time for a change, and, just as
in 1974, theres a suitably centrist and unthreatening successor at hand. Its
Vice President Al Gore, he of the stiff jokes told so endlessly by himself and others. The
undeniably competent Gore has had his own problems, mainly with revelations of his role in
the Democrats fund-raising orgy of 1995-96. But the main reason the Veep was losing
ground as a presidential sure thing in 2000 was his irreparably rigid and uncharismatic
persona. That may now be his main claim to the highest office in the land.
Jackson Baker is a senior editor of the Flyer.
|


|