Pieced Together
Russian artist reinvigorates classical style with inventive approach
By Michael Sims
APRIL 5, 1999:
The Parthenon is one of Nashville's immediately recognizable civic
icons, but most people don't think of it as a major venue for the visual
arts. Perhaps that perception is about to change. "We're determined to
pursue a more serious gallery status," says Lila Hall, assistant curator of
the new exhibition in the East Gallery of the Parthenon. "We're trying to
feature more lasting, museum-quality work."
If the current exhibition, "Painting as Improvisation Works by
Gregori Maiofis," is any indication, the Parthenon is off to a flying
start. Seldom does our timid little burg get to see work as challenging and
satisfying as the paintings of this enormously talented young Russian.
Gregori Maiofis (pronounced "May-office") was born in 1970 in Leningrad,
now restored to its pre-Soviet name of St. Petersburg. He inherited a
family tradition of artistic excellence: His father was a highly respected
book illustrator, his grandfather a renowned architect. "I began drawing at
a very early age," Maiofis recalls. "I can't remember not drawing. I even
made a couple of etchings at the age of 8, under my father's guidance."
Maiofis flew into Nashville from St. Petersburg for the opening
reception on Mar. 20. He is an intense young man with a trim beard and
Frida Kahlo eyebrows. Articulate and passionate, he speaks excellent
English. He was 21 when he first arrived in this country, and he soon
became interested in the modern philosophical movements headed by such
influential critics as Jacques Derrida and Roland Barthes. "My formation as
an artist," he says flatly, "took place in the U.S." However, he adds,
since 1996 he has spent 90 percent of his time back home in Russia.
Susan Shockley, head curator at the Parthenon, encountered Maiofis' work
by chance and immediately fell for it. "What Gregori does is make you look
at Western art history in a new way," she insists. "You see the classical
figure and you're drawn to look at it; you know it's going to be beautiful.
But then when you get closer to it, you find this disturbing quality."
He turns Western art on its head, Hall adds, "using these classical
elements but reevaluating them in a new and modern way, telling a new story
but with the same artistic language that has been used for centuries."
Maiofis' immersion in the classical style comes naturally. He compares
his father's illustrations to those of such figurative masters as Gustav
Doré. In Communist Russia, book illustration became an important
vehicle for art, because illustrators, dealing with revered texts that
lacked the topicality to threaten Soviet authority, worked relatively
censor-free.
Maiofis takes his father's classicism into decidedly modern territory.
In some of his paintings, magnificently drawn figures loll and cavort in
poses of classical Greek beauty. But they do so on fragments of canvas,
which Maiofis paints, cuts, and rearranges to form intriguing
juxtapositions, sometimes against a painted gridwork that confines his
fiery colors and furious brushwork. In other works, such as the provocative
triptych "Invention of the Other (II)," hands reach into the trimmed canvas
scenes to pull open the mouth of a male figure, creating an image of
vulnerability and violation.
Maiofis rejects the term "collage" to describe his work, because he
isn't comfortable with the aesthetic ideologies that created the collage
technique. He prefers the word "combination." "My work may be described as
the creation of combinations," he says. "Any cultural material may become a
constructive element; 'originality' becomes possible only in the very
organization of combinations."
Some of the paintings rework traditional themes and figures, while
others include direct quotations from older works--the face of a gypsy girl
from a Frans Hals painting, for example, or other references to Poussin and
Goya. Like Picasso in his reworkings of Velasquez's "Las Meninas," Maiofis
embraces and goes beyond the past in several masterful variations on Andrea
Del Sarto's portrayal of Abraham about to sacrifice Isaac. Most of the
scene is barely sketched in. Here and there, either painted onto the canvas
or painted onto cut-and-pasted pieces of canvas, are vignetted close-ups of
the tableau, such as the face of Abraham gazing heavenward hopefully. The
fractured combinations are moving but deliberately fraught with ambiguity.
Maiofis says of the narrative gaps in this series: "The created
'combination' is ready for further development, and it is the viewer who is
invited to complete the chain and to turn a fragmented image into a text
without 'blanks.'"
To sum up the nice fit between the artist and the museum, Lila Hall
weaves Gregori Maiofis and the Parthenon together in an appealing analogy:
"As we began to do research about Gregori, and we were seeing where he was
developing, it really seemed to fit with a new direction for the Parthenon.
We are a recreation of an ancient building. And Gregori produces fragments
that expound upon classical and historical themes, either events or other
artists' works. He creates these fragments--these symbols, or signs--and he
places them in an order that may be analogous to the way archeologists and
historians try to put together the fragments of the Parthenon."
Maiofis describes his work more simply: "I'm trying to create a style
that's able to incorporate almost everything." It seems to be working.

|