 |
Unwritten Rules
What We Live's free jazz
By Ed Hazell
APRIL 26, 1999:
Free improvisation is not as prevalent in new jazz as it is in European new
music. European musicians of the past several generations, from Derek Bailey
and Peter Brötzmann to John Butcher and Georg Grawe, improvise without
precondition more often than they play compositions (the formal ironies of the
Dutch being the exception to this generalization). New American improvisation
has its roots deep in jazz, which carries with it a heritage of improvisation
on compositions, whether Tin Pan Alley standards, Duke Ellington's big-band
numbers, or Anthony Braxton's analytical charts. Even Ornette Coleman's Free
Jazz, an important inspiration for free improvisers on both sides of the
Atlantic, used a written framework, however slight. For Americans working in
new music in a jazz tradition, such as William Parker, Tim Berne, Ken
Vandermark, and Joe Morris, free improvisation is an option, not a way of life.
The San Francisco-based trio What We Live, with composer-improvisers
saxophonist Larry Ochs (the "O" in ROVA Saxophone Quartet), bassist Lisle
Ellis, and drummer Donald Robinson, dedicate themselves to free improvisation
in the American vein. And their two latest albums, Never Was (Black
Saint) and Quintet for a Day (New World), show what happens when the
jazz sensibility meets free improvisation. Coherently spontaneous and
thoughtfully wild, these releases sound at times as if they were
through-composed, yet every note is improvised. The habits of compositional
structure are so ingrained in the players that even on the tabula rasa of free
improv they create order and beauty rather than chaos. The rhythmic
characteristics of swing and the textural qualities of the blues also inform
their playing, but in the widest possible terms, not in the literal Lincoln
Center way. The music has a gritty immediacy and a compelling propulsive feel
even at its most abstract.
Never Was is full of details a composer might think of, but executed on
the spur of the moment. Robinson's recurring snare-rim motif on "Were" helps
unify the opening moments of the track before new material is introduced by
Ochs; the redwood solidity of Ellis's ostinatos lend continuity to "Will Be."
The trio's collective sense for orchestration is impressive. "As Is" and the
title track use several different duo combinations in addition to the full trio
to vary the color and texture. All three members improvise melodic or rhythm
building blocks that interlock in different ways to create larger structures,
and they are careful not to repeat themselves from track to track.
From the beginning, the trio intended to have regular guests join them. Their
previous Black Saint album, What We Live Fo(u)r, consists of quartet
tracks with tenor-saxophonist Glenn Spearman, koto player Miya Masaoka,
violinist India Cook, and several others. If anything, the addition of
trumpeters Dave Douglas and Wadada Leo Smith on Quintet for a Day makes
the music even richer and more varied -- and, paradoxically, more tightly
structured. (A Black Saint CD due this fall will also feature the trio with
Smith and Douglas in separate performances.) The dialogue among the quintet is
assured and their responses to one another confident. On "A Brush with the
Groove" Douglas and Smith finish each other's phrases with eerie regularity and
seeming ease. On "Here Today," all five contribute sections of melody that they
string end to end in a sustained real-time composition full of unexpected
twists and turns. "Yours and Mine" reaches a level of intuitive, spontaneous
unity very few groups ever attain, with improvised arrangements of
folksong-like themes and inspired soloing from Smith and Ochs.
What We Live and their guests create group music that's somehow expressive of
individual will and personality. Ultimately that's how the music can transcend
its formal aspects and its arcane vocabulary of sounds (though those sounds
give pleasure). The "We" in the band's name refers not only to the collective
identity that forges the music but to us as well; it's a conspiratorial "we"
that shares the aspirations and feelings expressed by the trio.

|



|