 |
The Ruling Class
By Chris Davis
MAY 4, 1998:
Master Harold
and the Boys
Take away the airplanes, the trains, and trolley cars. Remove the
telephones and the traffic. Unplug the radios and turn off the
factories and listen to see if you can hear the sound of rags
being wrung into buckets of water. It is a sound that goes on
virtually unnoticed around the clock in every corner of the world.
It is a sound as old as civilization.
This simple aural signifier, coupled with the image of a black
man, wearing the formal livery of a waiter, on his knees with
his arms submerged to the elbows in a mop bucket, begins Athol
Fugards much-lauded indictment against South African racism and
apartheid, Master Harold
and the Boys. Fugards deceptively
simple conversation between young, white Master Harold and the
boys has lost none of its impact since the fall of apartheid,
and gains a special resonance when performed in Memphis, where
racial tensions still run high. Fugard clearly demonstrates that
racism is not the sole property of the ignorant, and neither is
it perpetuated by the ravings of isolated groups that make hate
their religion. Racism requires no laws to enforce it; neither
can laws prevent it. Fugards racism is the terrible secret that
has been whispered to the bellies of virgins by noble men of conquering
stock (read nice boys from good families) since the first slave
dipped a rag in the bucket.
When a celebrated piece of politically charged theatre is performed
by a liberal-minded theatre company for a like-minded theatregoing
audience whose beliefs already closely mirror the more obvious
moral sentiments of the play
well, it looses its oomph. It turns
into a football game where everyone is cheering for the home team.
These are mommas old-fashioned fixins for deadly theatre, and
the Memphis Black Repertory Theatres production of Master Harold
and the Boys often teeters on the brink of becoming a deadly
theatre experience, but is ultimately redeemed by the honesty
of the performances and the potency of Fugards language.

Alex Cooke, TC Sharpe, and Tony Anderson in the Memphis Black Repertory Theatre production of Master Harold
and the Boys.
|
As Sam and Willie, T.C. Sharpe and Tony Anderson work well together.
Their quibbles over the finer points of ballroom dancing call
to mind the dilemma-plagued banter of Becketts tramps; however,
their tremendous formality is closer in spirit to those excruciatingly
well-mannered chipmunks of cartoon fame. Even as Willie embarks
on a hateful, fuck that-laden speech proclaiming his dance (and
presumably life) partner a whore, it manages to seem strangely
and falsely polite. These early moments, which Sam and Willie
share alone together, are crucial to the plays success. When
Harold enters, there must be a distinct change in tone. Harold
has been against his parents best advisement overly friendly
with Willie and Sam for years, but he is also the plays lone
representative of the white ruling class. The word apartheid is
never mentioned once throughout the play it must, therefore,
be sensed in every action that occurs from the moment Harold comes
in from the rain, and in this production it is not.
In the role of Sam, TC Sharpe depends on his considerable charisma,
which is an infinitely watchable disappointment. Sharpe plays
Sam as a loveable smoothie and for the most part he makes it work,
but he misses the crushing desperation of a grown man willing
to swallow his dignity for the formal blessing of a child. Sharpe
is a formidable performer who never stops growing with a role,
however, and on opening night there were definite indications
that he hadnt quite gotten his legs yet.
Alex Cookes Master Harold captures the eagerness of a young mind
filled with romantic notions. Harold crows about social progress
and real change while constantly reminding Willie and Sam that
the boss son is still the boss. In his youthful enthusiasm for
all things progressive, Harold has managed to somehow reconcile
Marx and Darwin, and when he commands Willie and Sam to act [their]
age, Cooke reconciles the absolute authority of a conqueror with
the innocence of a young man trying to do the right thing. Though
intelligently rendered, Cookes overall performance is a bit stiff.
His British accent wanders all over the place, and disappears
entirely in his best moments. The dialect is a distraction to
the audience, and could be dropped altogether. No one would miss
it.
Willie is a simple man with one big dream left in him, and Tony
Anderson plays him to near perfection. Willie seems happy with,
or at least resigned to, his servile role. His expressed aspirations
dont include equality or social progress. Willie wants to be
a ballroom champion, and thinks he could be if his partner hadnt
run away. The role of Willie is the least showy of the three characters,
and Anderson measures up to one of an actors greatest challenges
to remain intrinsically involved in the action without having
to speak.
The mostly well-conceived performances of Sharpe and Cooke deteriorate
into misty-eyed monotony as the play draws to a close. An ocean
of tears does not add up to a tidy resolution. This isnt Driving
Miss Daisy, and there are not going to be any declarations of
friendship from Harold its not in the script, but then again,
neither is the brief tribal dance Willie and Sam perform. Much
effort has been made to enhance the dignity of the boys, and
mitigate the bigotry of Master Harold. Although that may seem
like the right thing to do, it reduces the power of the play a
thousandfold. This is not, by any stretch, a feel-good play,
and the only glimmer of hope at its end is Willies realization
that the first step toward entering the collision-free world of
a ballroom champion is not to beat your partner.
Noises Off
The British farce Noises Off, like all British farce, is nothing
without velocity and exactitude.Theatre Memphis current production
of Michael Frayns Noises Off is not consistently up to the rigorous
demands of the genre; overall, whats missing is the slickness
of spontaneity, a critical sense that the crazed proceedings are
truly unfolding before us. However, there are enough dead-on,
perfectly executed at times even inspired moments to make
the evening worthwhile.
The piece is an acerbic, yet indulgently fond, backstage story
send-up of the theatrical art, generally, and of actors, specifically:
the egos, the camaraderie (both genuine and false), the potential
for sharing a large vision, the dire pettiness and utter lack
of objectivity, the uses and abuses of a craft dedicated to the
willful confusion of truth with illusion.
The first act of Noises Off involves an indifferently talented
troupe of actors trying to get up a production of a silly sex-comedy,
Nothing On, set in an English country house. Under-rehearsed and
tripping over their thespic shortcomings with missed cues, faulty
entrances, and moronic questions, the ragged band includes all
the basic stock types, played in the TM production by Jenn Welch,
Brian Mott, Brett D. Cullum, Jack Kendall, Ann G. Sharp, and Jeanna
Juleson. Art Oden plays the stage manager, Louise Casini the assistant
director, and Hugh Fraser the director. In the second act, we
view the company from backstage after they have taken the show
on tour. That they manage at all is the crux of the comedy here,
since by this point all their pent-up hostilities have begun to
ignite into bitter internecine sniping and petty sabotage.
As the director at his wits end, Fraser is superb. Some of the
actors, especially Cullum and Mott, occasionally come close to
the tone and pace needed to make Frayns farce cook; but it is
the technical superiority of Frasers vocal and physical performance
and the hilarious truth of his deeply British desperation
that really lend cachet to this Theatre Memphis production. Hadley Hury
|


|