The General
Bobby Knight--he's our problem, too
By Randy Horick
MAY 15, 2000:
Former Vanderbilt basketball coach C.M. Newton likes to tell a
favorite Bobby Knight story. When he served as Knight's assistant for the
1984 U.S. Olympic basketball team, the General asked C.M. one afternoon to
accompany him to an Indiana booster club dinner that evening.
Knowing from his own experience why coaches often approach such
events with the eagerness of root canal patients, Newton politely demurred.
Trust me, said Knight, this one will be different. It will be brief. He
guaranteed it.
Newton, still skeptical, begged off again, but Knight refused to take no
for an answer, and the Vandy coach found himself that night eating rubbery
chicken with a room full of Hoosiers. After dinner, when Knight rose to
address the gathering, he explained that he had no prepared remarks. But he
would be happy to answer questions. Just one rule: no dumb questions.
For a moment, the room was quiet as the boosters were suddenly seized by
the same fear of asking an unworthy question. Finally, one man raised his
hand. "Um, coach," he asked, "what are our prospects for next year?"
Knight eyed the fan momentarily. "You know," he replied, "that's a
really dumb question."
After that, no one else could summon the courage to speak. "Well," said
Knight, "if there are no more questions, thanks for coming."
"See," he told Newton on the drive back, "I told you it would be
short."
The tale--and almost everyone who knows Bobby has a similar one--is
quintessentially Knight. He was bullying and overbearing, and he stiffed
all those who had come to hear him speak, but Hoosier fans seldom seem to
mind. "Aw, that's just Bobby."
"Just Bobby," of course, encompasses a range of qualities.
There's the honest Bobby Knight whose basketball program is cleaner than
a German lavatory.
There's the concerned Bobby Knight who makes sure that his players not
only attend class but put themselves on track to graduate.
There's the fatherly Knight who accompanied one of his current players,
Kirk Haston, back home to Tennessee after Haston's mother was killed in a
tornado.
Then, of course, there's the Knight you know too well. The one who waves
used toilet paper in the faces of his players. The one who, infuriated by
their poor play in a road loss at Illinois, ordered two of his players to
find their own transportation back to Indiana.
There's the Knight who, while representing the United States as a coach
in Puerto Rico, referred to a Brazilian women's team as whores, then shoved
a police officer who accosted him over the slur. There's the Knight who
turns profane and surly in the presence of the assembled media, as if
through some Pavlovian response.
And, as the videotape clearly shows, there's the Knight who not only
curses his players but, on at least one occasion, has grabbed one by the
throat.
For years, Bobby's apologists--and in Indiana they are legion--have
suggested that the coach's better angels atone for his devils.
Now, however, for the first time, Knight's job may be in jeopardy.
Maybe, folks say, he went too far this time in choking a player--and in
engaging in a shoving match with Indiana's athletic director, his boss.
But the disturbing truth is that, in fact, Knight owes his current
pickle to the fact that he has not gone far enough--at least not in the
NCAA Tournament.
Sure, his recent actions merit firing. On the other hand, his behavior
merited firing, if not dope-slapping and a few swift kicks, more times in
the past than you could count. Knight, after all, didn't just suddenly
begin acting deranged. He has publicly whaled on players before--most
notably, his own son--and has even scrapped with an opposing fan.
What's different now is not Bobby's performance but that of his
squad.
It has been 13 years since Indiana won a national championship. The
Hoosiers are no longer a Top 10 program. Lately in the big tournament, they
have tended to lose early, often, and (Yo, Pepperdine!) embarrassingly. You
don't have to label yourself as a cynic to suggest that the quality of
Knight's character has become more worrisome to Indianans as the quality of
his teams has declined. That he was not fired when he assaulted a cop, or
when he abandoned two players away from home, and that he is in serious
trouble only now, reveals a much more disturbing truth about us than him.
I say "us" lest you sanctimoniously wonder why Indianans tolerate such a
bully as a representative of their state. You may find that, although most
other coaches don't use soiled toilet paper as motivational tools, many of
the rest of us Pharisees aren't much better than our Hoosier brethren when
it comes to excusing inexcusable actions in the name of winning.
At Ohio State, Woody Hayes--who was two or three bubbles off plumb on
his most lucid days--finally had to go full-bore, slobbering nuts and
attack an opposing player before people dared to suggest his retirement.
(Go to practically any public building in Columbus even now, and you'll
find reverential photographs of Woodrow, spookily reminiscent of the once
ubiquitous portraits of Lenin in Moscow.)
It's not coincidence that, in Chicago, Mike Ditka was regarded as a
lovable curmudgeon, or maybe an eccentric uncle, when the Bears were
advancing toward their Super Bowl crown. It was only after he began
coaching losers that people suddenly began to recognize Iron Mike as a
violently unstable lout.
At Alabama, after a disappointing season two years ago, fans of the
Crimson Tide were ready to brand a scarlet A on coach Mike Dubose for his
marital infidelities. Somehow, the condemnations stopped once the team
began winning, and it's a distant memory this year, when Alabama will
likely possess the best football team in the SEC.
Now, here's the sacrilegious, closer-to-home question. Would we, as
Tennesseans, remain as sanguine about Pat Summitt's courtside manner, or
lack of manners, if the Lady Vols were not appearing in the Final Four
almost every year?
When it comes to heaping public, verbal abuse--and abuse is not too
strong a word--Bobby has nothing on Pat. That's appropriate enough if
you're preparing young people for war. Despite all the martial imagery with
which we surround the game, basketball ain't close.
Were the Lady Vols a mediocre team, people might figure that Pat was
prime for Prozac. We might wonder about a person so obsessive about her job
that she flew to Pennsylvania on a recruiting trip when she was due any day
to give birth (her water broke in the recruit's home).
Ah, we say, that's just Pat. That's just what it takes to win.
As Vol fans, we'd rather condemn the accusing English professor than
seriously consider whether UT's athletic department changes Fs to As for
athletes, or enrolls them in classes that will keep them eligible to play
but won't advance them toward a degree.
And Vandy fans, feeling smugly above it all, recount how many of you
would have eagerly 86ed any academic standards that stood between Ron
Mercer and a Commodore uniform, or greeted the recruitment of other
marginal students with "It's about time!"
Near the end of his life, Vince Lombardi expressed regret over his
famous quote, "Winning isn't everything; it's the only thing." The
statement that became most associated with his life did not reflect his
true feelings, he said.
But, for most of us, there was no need to apologize. Whether or not that
quote captured Lombardi's sentiments, it captures our national sensibility
just fine.
And as long as it does, Bobby Knight is neither Indiana's problem nor
its creation. He's ours.

|