Screw Jenny Jones
By Cap'n O
MAY 24, 1999:
Now that TV freak show host Jenny Jones has been ordered to pay
$25 million to the family of a gay man who was shot to death after
going on the show to reveal a crush on another man, the pundits
are screaming that the verdict is a blow to free speech.
It's doubtful that the verdict will deprive of us of our free
speech rights. University speech codes and Democratic politicians
are already doing that. But if the verdict does hurt Jones' show,
then good. She deserves it.
All of the daytime TV shows are different, but they have a few
things in common. They appeal to the sentimental, the underoccupied
and the unemployed. They use real people's problems to provide
cheap entertainment. This is hardly a new concept--advice columnists
and lurid crime coverage have been staples of our culture for
years--but TV talk shows and their cousins, the crime re-enactment
dramas, have learned how to milk the market by putting in the
least effort and expense to reap the most profit.
What neither the pontificating pundits nor the electronic apologists
seem to recognize or want to admit is that daytime television
is a varied sub-market. Within the category, there are different
programs fulfilling different emotional audience requirements.
Talk shows come and go, and those that fail to find a niche with
the daytime audience disappear quickly. The shows need more than
freakish guests; they operate on the personality of the host.
For the purely and unapologetically salacious, Jerry Springer
gathers half-dressed, loudmouthed exhibitionists reveling in their
own perverse accomplishments. His guests aren't trying to convince
anybody of anything. They just want to be on TV. Ricki Lake, formerly
fat phenomenon and star of such classics as Hairspray,
celebrated her own weight loss and departure from professional
embarrassment (as an actress she was best known for her obesity)
by encouraging others to embarrass themselves onscreen. Perhaps
because of her own background, Ricki really appears to sympathize
with the misfits she features.
Then there is Montel Williams, military in his bearing and unabashedly
judgmental. His shtick is self-discipline and personal responsibility.
Although often surreal in the context he places himself in, he
pulls it off most of the time. Only Montel could get away with
having his own brother as a guest on a program about men who act
like irresponsible, self-centered jerks.
Jones has her own trademark style: deceit and hypocrisy. Out of
all of them, her show relies most heavily on lies, ambushes and
surprises. The industry does itself a disservice in claiming common
cause with this mendacious loser.
Jones and her defenders point out that broadcasters have been
fooling people since "Candid Camera" and "This
Is Your Life." But there's a difference. "Candid Camera"
never intruded upon people's real life longings. "This Is
Your Life" genuinely attempted to evoke pleasant memories.
Lake is a former geek sympathizing with other geeks and occasionally
taking them to task for their follies. In contrast, Jones maintains
a supercilious and mocking tone throughout her freak show. Unlike
Springer's guests, many of her subjects are true innocents.
Little kids know the difference between staring rudely at a man
with a hideous birthmark and looking at some guy with a blue mohawk.
The mohawk is a choice. Guests on Jones' program aren't given
that choice. They have no opportunity for informed consent. They
are brought on stage under false pretenses in order to experience
pain and embarrassment.
Jones and her producers may or may not have known of Jonathan
Schmitz's history of emotional problems. What they did know,
or they wouldn't have bothered to put him on stage, was that he
was a redneck with a fragile ego who would be upset to find out
that his secret admirer was a man. They wanted him upset. That's
what the show is all about.
Jones is crying over Scott Amedure's death now. But she certainly
hasn't adjusted her modus operandi--that might cost her in the
ratings. Even a death and a lawsuit haven't made her see her guests
as human individuals.
There are limits to the First Amendment. There also ought to be
limits to the amount of money someone like Jenny Jones can make
off the deliberate mistreatment and belittlement of others. This
verdict is a start.

|