 |
Barefoot in the Park
New Age Ceremonies at National Parks Are More Than a Headache
By Brendan Doherty
AUGUST 10, 1998:
When the X Family received the news of their son's sudden death,
they were saddened. In the cryptic instructions left to the family
in John X's will were specific instructions to cremate John and
scatter his ashes in Chaco Canyon. The family, living in the Midwest,
felt that they had no choice but to make the 2,000-mile drive
out to the remote high desert steppe land, to a place they had
never been before, to say goodbye to their son, brother and cousin,
John. They drove to the park, opened the box, unscrewed the top
of the metal container and with reverence, lifted John's pieces
and dust into the air and all throughout the ruins of Chaco Canyon.
It's no real surprise that John wished to have his spirit and
his earthly remains left there. The complex of Chaco Canyon, an
Anasazi Indian
settlement 60 miles from Farmington, N.M., was, at its height
near A.D. 1,000 the largest settlement in North America. The ancestral
home for many of the Pueblo Indian tribes in the Rio Grande Valley
and beyond, it has been called "America's Stonehenge."
Contained here are thousands of rooms in the
complex of 13 major ruins, which include precise astronomical
alignments built into the mud and rock walls at the base of sandstone
cliffs. The
area is a national park and was also designated
a World Heritage Site--a United Nations ranking that includes
the Pyramids of Giza and Mexico's Chichén Itzá.
But what was meant to be a reverent end for someone's life is
one of the numerous events at Chaco that is costing thousands
to clean up, deeply offending the workers and in at least two
cases resulting in ashes being retrieved and buried in an Albuquerque
funeral area for the indigent and unknown. New Age abuses are
digging up deep
differences in the Native and Anglo communities at the 900-year-old
kiva: Casa Rinconada, the best preserved kiva, long open for ceremonies
and the nearly 90,000 annual visitors, was closed in October last
year.
A report from a visitor allowed Family X to be traced. Their son's
remains were vacuumed up with a generator and a Shop-Vac and returned
to the stunned family. If the family was unfindable,
however, the ashes would have been cleaned out of the park, turned
over to the Office of the Medical Examiner and buried in Albuquerque
with homeless people, unidentifiable victims and the poor. Three
distinct sets of ashes collected in the pueblo in the past two
years have made that trip.
"You can't really vacuum ashes up," says Dabney Ford,
Chaco Canyon archaeologist. "You can't really clean it up.
You can't really get the fragment of bone out of there. We suspect
that those people depositing cremations in Chaco are doing it
out of extreme respect for their loved ones. It's been going on
for several years, with an increase in the past five years. ...
It creates some serious problems."
Troubling the Navajos working at the park is the traditional tenet
that disturbing human remains is an evil act. Because of their
religious beliefs, they do not believe that they can enter the
kiva to remove cremated remains. The sunken kivas were used by
the culture occupying Chaco for religious ceremonies. Upsetting
the tribes is the sacred sites' disrupted integrity--spiritual
and actual--that occurs often when white, uninitiated people usurp
and sully the ancient site with their remains. Signs posted at
the site caution visitors not to leave items, but the ash deposits
continue, and New Age ceremonies continue to create sacrilege,
personnel problems, cost and headaches for the park.
"We have to clean the ashes out at night," says Ford.
"We don't want visitors to see that. For the Native workers
here, it's an evil act, but it's more than that. It's a troubling
sacrilege. So much so that the tools that we use to clean up the
mess have to be thrown away. If we put the remains in the vehicles,
they don't feel good about that, either. We have to use our personal
vehicles under cover of night. We throw things away."
According to Ford, the first recognized deposit occurred on the
unprotected kiva floor, where ashes blew around for several hours
before park personnel realized what it was. The cost for the cleanup:
$6,000. Toothbrushes had to be used to pick the small grey pieces
out of the dusty floor so as not to disturb the sacred kiva floor.
Backfill dirt prevented the fine-tooth comb routine, but it hasn't
stopped the ash-interring, which has cost the park more than $10,000
to clean up in the past few years. People have probably been doing
it for years, says Ford.
Ash cleanups, according to archaeologist Philip Lopiccilo of the
National Park Service, cost about $2,500 for each event. In addition
to the illegal interrment of ashes are illegal incidents in one
form or another that occur almost daily during the busy summer
season. Other problems occur when visitors try to climb the fragile
walls or dig into the walls to deposit personal effects or trash,
speeding up the erosion of the centuries-old site.
But the ashes are the worst. Beyond dollar terms, Ford says, are
the bad feelings that happen when ashes are found.
"You can't factor that in," says Ford. "We get
sickened by it, sometimes literally. On one hand, our job is protecting
the site, and on the other, we do it so the public can view this.
Sometimes those are diametrically opposed. When you bring people
into the integrity these sites hold, and multiple cultures collide,
things like this happen."
"We were not involved in the decision to close Casa Rinconada,"
says Petuuche Gilbert, realty officer for the Pueblo of Acoma,
a tribe that has ancestral lineage that includes Chaco Canyon
and the wider Mesa Verde Anasazi cultures. "It prevents us
from entering that door and praying there. The archaeological
excavation of that site was desecration in the first place; they
removed many of the cultural artifacts that were there (to begin
with). We abhor that. These are the aboriginal homes of today's
Pueblo Indian people. After that, we, like other people, started
going into that kiva like the tourists and other groups. We went
in there to say the prayers. We're prevented from doing that now."
The claim by Native Americans to the area is more than symbolic.
Prayer ceremonies are still active at the site. According to Gilbert
and a
number of expert anthropologists and archaeologists studying Native
Americans, the ruins have a spiritual essence for native people.
With the fill dirt, the 64-foot diameter kiva, once known for
its incredible acoustics, is changed. Bajada Butte, just south
of the Canyon, has restricted access as well.
"Native Americans have to gain permission from the park superintendent
in order to go up there and pray," says Gilbert. "It's
a spiritual place, and it's like having a policeman at your church
door. When non-Indians abuse the area, that's where it becomes
disrespectful, and it desecrates that place. "It's now under
Park Service control, but it still belongs to the Pueblo Indian
people. "It's like their church. There's nothing wrong with
non-Natives going in there and maybe praying. But how do you allow
only Native American people without discriminating against other
Americans?"
Increasing numbers of travelers have compromised other sites and
parks in New Mexico as well. Park rangers at Bandelier National
Monument southwest of Los Alamos have reported carving into the
soft volcanic tuff cave ceilings. The site is also an Anasazi
ancestral land, but it receives nearly 400,000 visitors each year.
So many people go through the park in the summer that there is
often a one-hour wait for parking, according to Chris Judson,
park ranger at Bandelier since 1976.
"We have a particular dilemma," Judson says. "We
have an area that is definitely a kiva, ceremonial place and school.
People will go in there and carve their names, names of rock bands,
whatever, into the stone. It's not going to grow back or fix itself.
We've worked hard for 80 years at the park for people to see the
park in its glory. We want future people to see this. But people
think that rules don't apply to them. The park is in worse shape
than it's ever been, and we are not in the position to take care
of the problems. We have two or three times the number of people
annually (than the number) we were designed for."
What park employees say is happening is not just a clash of cultures
but a radical difference in values.
"What one person feels is a sacred thing, another will not,"
says Ford.
Analogies for Native culture and Anglo, Hispanic or historic cultures
don't really work, according to Dabney Ford, who hopes that news
of what actually happens to cleaned ashes will discourage others
from their ill-planned attempt at reverence.
"You can make graphic comparisons, but there just aren't
any correlations in our culture," Ford says. "Grandmother's
living room comes close, and church, well, there just aren't any
direct analogies. It's complex, and it's disturbing. When this
happens, it's a lose-lose-lose situation. We'd like it to stop."
?

|







|