|
|
![]() |
|
In L.A. Confidential, there's something rotten in la-la land. By Jesse Fox Mayshark SEPTEMBER 29, 1997: I was talking recently to a friend who moved to Los Angeles after spending several years living the city mouse life in New York. Reflecting on his new home, he said it wasn't such a bad place, "as long as you can accept that everybody spends a lot of time worrying about how they look, and looking to see how you look. In Manhattan, people are always trying to show off their brains. In L.A., they show off their looks."
The new thriller L.A. Confidential plays off that dark superficiality, off the difference between the way things seem and the way they really are. Set in 1950s Hollywood, it's a clever detective yarn about celebrity, duplicity, and the importance of appearances. And if it ultimately seems a little hollow, that's at least in keeping with its theme.
He's complemented in the narrative by two young officers who at first seem like polar oppositesthe straight-arrow Exley (Guy Pearce) and the violent Bud (Russell Crowe). Exley's an apple-polishing do-gooder trying to fulfill the legacy of a father who was shot down in the line of police duty. Bud's a troubled loner with a penchant for roughing up wife-beaters.
The sinister police department, in effect, serves as the movie's stand-in for all of Los Angeles. On the surface, it's all propriety and "just the facts" efficiency, a model of modern law enforcement for a model modern city. But from savage prisoner beatings (obvious shades of Rodney King) to the department's willingness to rewrite events to suit its own public relations purposes, this is an outfit where dubious ends are used to justify brutal means. Without overstating the point, the movie draws a clear line from its hawk-nosed, authoritarian police captain (James Cromwell, who's parlayed his endearing stint in Babe into a string of strong character roles) to the equally image- and power-obsessed Darryl Gates.
The cast is terrific (especially Australian actors Pearce and Crowe, who hold their own with the fiendishly talented Spacey), and the dialogue and score are crisp in an intentionally pulpy way. The only problem with the film is a level of cool detachment throughout, which ends up making it seem like a merely good movie trying to be a great one. It's not so much that there aren't any really likable charactersit's that Hanson is so caught up in exposing the movie's many layers of deception that he doesn't bother to give it much of a heart. It all feels a little cold, which makes for an entertaining film that never quite becomes engrossing, a complex thriller that's easy to enjoy but hard to get passionate about. But then, they don't have passion in L.A., do they?
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
© 1995-99 DesertNet, LLC . Metro Pulse . Info Booth . Powered by Dispatch |
|