Dress for Success?
Even Teachers Need to Look the Part
By Cap'n O
OCTOBER 13, 1997:
It was a sight so terrible that I still shudder when I think of
it decades later. And that's most of the time because it was seared
into my mind, and there it remains, robbing me of productivity
during the day and of sleep at night.
There was no warning. A classmate and I were crawling around the
floor in kindergarten one day while waiting for our teacher, an
old German woman, to read to the class. She sat on a chair in
the middle of the room. Suddenly I looked up and there it was--a
massive white girdle, complete with hooks, straps, snaps and whatever
underneath her skirt!
I pounded my classmate's arm and pointed. He looked. There was
no laughter. We were traumatized. The sight forever altered our
lives. In later years when classmates urged us to look up girls'
dresses, we trembled and suffered silently the taunts that we
were "different." As teens and young adults, we declined
to date females out of fear that we would encounter that thing
underneath their dresses. Inevitably, we were seized with the
fear that torments young men, that maybe we were different.
I reveal this painful episode to point out the need in the public
schools for dress codes for teachers. Albuquerque Public Schools
has a student dress code, and now some APS board members want
one for teachers. Many teachers and their union representatives
are resisting. They shouldn't.
Some APS teachers are showing up to class in short-shorts, tank
tops, pants with holes and other garments that fall short of giving
them a professional appearance. If kids have to dress decently,
so should teachers.
Believe me, no one knows better than I that how one dresses is
unrelated to job performance. There's no correlation between the
two whatsoever. A carpenter can pound nails and a plumber can
loosen pipes whether dressed in coveralls or short-shorts. A bank
teller can count money whether outfitted in a business suit or
in spiked heels, black mesh stockings, leather mini-skirt, see-through
blouse, no bra and fluorescent pink lipstick.
Just because an undertaker comes to services wearing a clown costume
doesn't mean he can't embalm a stiff. Police officers can write
tickets, chase crooks and shoot people while adorned in their
uninspiring, dark blue uniforms or in gaily colored dancing tights.
If a lawyer goes to court in boxing shorts, so what? Nothing says
that one's grasp of and ability to argue constitutional law increases
in direct proportion to the number of pinstriped suits one owns.
And I would never doubt the ability of a president who walked
around in dirty, wrinkled shirts and torn pants to carry out his
presidential duties. You don't need a pressed shirt and expensive
suit to launch a nuclear first strike.
No, how one dresses has nothing to with how one does a job. But
how one dresses does have an impact on others. The undertaker
in a clown outfit might rattle off some great prayers. But the
family of the deceased might view his attire as disrespectful
in the face of their grief. The spike-heeled, braless bank teller
could be a whiz at math, but people who gave her money--especially
horny men--would expect more than a smile and a receipt from the
transaction. The fact is, in the real world it does matter how
you dress. And when you're in the business of educating kids,
you need to teach them about the real world. Showing up to work
dressed like slobs or hookers sends them the wrong message. It
can also be distracting and, as in my case, traumatizing.
That German teacher was an excellent reader. But her dress was
inappropriate attire for someone who was going to sit on a chair
in front of a bunch of kids on the floor. And it ruined me for
life. It robbed me of my manliness. Because even now I get the
nervous shakes when I look up a woman's dress.
--Cap'n O
|