No Paparazzi Here!
By Jacqueline Marino
OCTOBER 27, 1997:
don't know for sure if
my high-school principal ever solicited a prostitute. But I doubt
it. Sister Jane Marie was a matronly disciplinarian type who (my
parents felt assured) would always make sure that the hem of my
regulation skirt fell demurely below the knees.
It wasn't just what Sister Jane Marie
did, but who she was that helped convince my parents to send her
school a big, fat tuition check each fall. At the time, I did not
think of her as a human being with weaknesses and shortcomings.
She was an authoritative administrator who commanded respect. My
parents -- like most parents, I would expect -- wanted their
children to regard teachers and school administrators as
exemplary role models. While going through those impressionable
teenage years, young adults should have no reason to question the
moral judgment of the people who enforce standards of conduct at
their schools.
After Millington Central High School
principal Trent McVay was arrested for allegedly patronizing a
prostitute two weeks ago, several media prominently featured the
story in their news reports. The Commercial Appeal
gave him a front-page spread, and WREG-TV Channel 3 and WMC-TV
Channel 5 led their newscasts with the story.
The saturation nature of the coverage
appalled our John Branston, Contemporary Media's special projects
director, who in a Flyer media column last week blasted
the news organizations for sensationalism. Branston felt McVay's
arrest should have been covered, but not on page one. I disagree.
I think it was good, old-fashioned journalistic responsibility,
not sensationalism, that prompted the daily newspaper to feature
McVay's arrest prominently below the fold.
McVay became a public figure two years
ago when he helped stabilize racial tensions at his school. He's
also an authority figure for teenagers whose parents trust them
to him five days a week. Those parents have a right to know that
he has been charged with a criminal act. Sure, it's only
prostitution, a Class B misdemeanor and "victimless"
crime that typically carries a penalty of $150 plus court costs
on a first offense. But McVay, like anyone who works with
children, should be held to a higher standard of moral conduct
than, say, electricians or construction workers. Not only does
the story of his arrest have news value, but it is also a public
service to the parents of that school.
To imply that the local media initially
handled the story in a cruelly sensational manner is wrong, as is
the assertion that this proves media ethics have fallen to an
all-time low. Branston says the media were more discerning a few
years ago when they resisted publishing a scrapbook of pictures
of well-known topless club patrons taken during a police raid.
Although many people in this town refuse
to believe patronizing a topless club is any different from
patronizing a prostitute, the law makes the distinction quite
clear. The run-of-the-mill topless-club patron may be accused of
a litany of character flaws, but not of breaking the law (as long
as patronizing a topless club remains legal, of course). A person
who solicits a prostitute actually commits a crime.
Does a public figure arrested for
allegedly patronizing a prostitute deserve to have his name and
picture splashed across the front page of the daily newspaper?
Not always. If McVay is innocent as he claims, the media
attention, in retrospect, will seem cruel. But if he is guilty as
charged, the parents of Millington Central students will be glad
the media made sure they knew about it.
News organizations take risks all the
time when they publish or broadcast stories about such arrests.
If they don't report them, they fall short of their duty to
inform the public. If they do, they are criticized for being
unfair. It will be a sad day when editors and producers curtail
coverage of legitimate news stories just to protect reputations.
News organizations err everyday. Let's hope they err on the side
of the public's right to know.
(Jacqueline Marino is a staff writer
for the Flyer.)
|