 |
Que viva Mexico?
Two Art Books Raise Provocative Questions About the Nature of Cultural Identity
By Fred Turner
NOVEMBER 3, 1997:
HELEN LEVITT: MEXICO CITY, with an essay by James Oles. DoubleTake/W.W. Norton, 141 pages, $35.
TEMPLE OF CONFESSIONS: MEXICAN BEASTS AND LIVING SANTOS, by Guillermo
Gómez-Peña and Roberto Sifuentes. powerHouse Books, 143 pages,
$29.95.
Never mind the hush of whitewashed galleries: in the world of documentary art,
there's a war going on. On one side are the humanists. These folks see
documentary work as an exercise in revealing the essential human likeness
between viewer and viewed. On the other side lurk the postmodernists. Armed
with a multicultural, multimedia sensibility, these artists suspect
traditionalists of a hidden antipathy toward "the Other." Rather than promote
what they regard to be an illusory empathy between subject and audience, they
urge their audiences to confront constructions of cultural difference, both in
the world at large and within themselves.
Helen Levitt's photographs of Mexico City street life circa 1941 clearly
belong to the first tradition. Yet when viewed alongside Guillermo
Gómez-Peña and Roberto Sifuentes's explosive postmodern collage, they
suggest that the two schools might not have to come to blows. For all Levitt's
emphasis on the transcendent humanity of her subjects, her Mexicans emerge very
much as creatures of a particular time and place. And for all their attention
to intercultural conflict, Gómez-Peña and Sifuentes never entirely
close off the possibility of transcultural communion.
Levitt, of course, is most famous for her images of children playing in the
streets of New York. While not always up to the standard of that work, the
photographs in Helen Levitt: Mexico City also depict ephemeral moments
in the daily lives of strangers in the street: a man running for a bus, a trio
of mutts camped outside a doorway, a flower seller at work. Unlike Manuel
Alvarez Bravo, Edward Weston, or Paul Strand, all of whom worked in Mexico
early in the century, Levitt rarely reaches for the grand formal composition or
the stinging social critique. Rather, she tries to see beyond the webs of
poverty and wealth, religious discipline and official corruption, that
characterized Mexico in the 1940s to focus on the individual.
Such attention to human particulars gives Levitt's photographs much of their
appeal: to look at a photograph and feel the living presence of its now-dead
subjects can be an almost mystical experience. But as the postmodernists would
be the first to point out, this mystical sense of connection often glosses over
social realities. In one particularly arresting image, a washerwoman, down on
her knees in the dirt, glares up at Levitt as if to dare her to acknowledge not
only her obvious beauty but also her poverty. Photography reveals the woman's
suffering, but Levitt's attempt to create an empathetic moment obscures its
social roots.
In Guillermo Gómez-Peña and Roberto Sifuentes's Temple of
Confessions, on the other hand, we come face to face with the social
construction of Mexican identity. The book documents a performance piece first
staged at Arizona's Scottsdale Center for the Arts in 1994. There, Sifuentes
and MacArthur fellow Gómez-Peña built two altars on opposite sides of
a mock mortuary. At the first, the "Chapel of Desires," Sifuentes perched
inside a Plexiglas box, his arms decorated with pre-Columbian tattoos and his
bloodstained tank top pierced with bullet holes. Surrounded by cockroaches, a
live iguana, drug paraphernalia, and a whip, he became what
Gómez-Peña calls an "ethno-cyborg" of the Chicano variety.
Gómez-Peña himself sat atop a toilet in another box, the "Chapel of
Fears," draped in tourist souvenirs and tribal talismans, a pseudo-Aztec crown
of feathers on his head. In front of each of these Tex-Mex-Aztec "saints,"
visitors found a microphone and a prayer stool, where they could "confess"
their fears and desires about Mexicans.
These confessions -- sexual, scatological, political -- fill much of Temple
of Confessions. Yet there are also photographs of the performers, essays by
anthropologists, velvet paintings of bikini-clad women in sombreros -- you name
it. As Gómez-Peña and Sifuentes explain, the book, like the
performance it chronicles, tries to depict and defuse American cultural
projections about Mexicans. It is an attempt, they write, "to open a Pandora's
box and let loose the colonial demons."
It does so with abandon. Temple of Confessions is everything Helen
Levitt's photographs are not: caustic, confrontational, ironic, self-conscious.
As what Gómez-Peña and Sifuentes call "a project of reversed
anthropology," the volume makes a delicious riposte to conventional
"scientific" studies and even to their distant cousin, the straight documentary
photograph. Yet the book also raises certain questions: is a Mexican more than
the sum of the stories told about Mexicans? And what will remain after
Gómez-Peña and Sifuentes have stripped these stories away? For
answers, we must return to the work of humanists like Helen Levitt -- to the
possibility that some part of ourselves stands beyond the reach of cultural
labels, and can be shared.
Fred Turner is the author of Echoes of Combat: The Vietnam War in
American Memory.
|


|