 |
Endpapers
By Leonard Gill, Editor
NOVEMBER 17, 1997:
Perfidia
By Judith Rossner
Nan A. Talese/Doubleday, 308 pp., $23.95
AFTER A SIGNIFICANT LULL, AT least in
terms of critical and popular attention, Judith Rossner is back
with a powerful novel centered on a complex, mother-daughter
relationship. Inspired, as was Rossner's Looking for Mr.
Goodbar, by a real-life murder case, her latest novel, Perfidia,
models its narrator and central character, Madeleine Stern, on
the young woman whose acceptance to Harvard was rescinded when
the college learned that she had murdered her mother.
Rossner's characterization of Madeleine
rivals only that of her mother, Anita, a brilliant, self-made
woman whose volcanic temperament keeps her daughter constantly on
edge. When the two are "friends," readers glimpse
Anita's enticing qualities: She's warm, darkly witty,
conspiratorial. But just as quickly -- and in direct relation to
the amount of Tequila consumed -- she becomes physically and
verbally abusive.
Perfidia, Spanish for betrayal,
opens with Anita leaving Madeleine's father, a Dartmouth
professor, and taking the 5-year-old with her on the road. They
settle in Santa Fe, where Anita opens an art gallery and quickly
becomes pregnant with Madeleine's half-brother Billy, a child she
favors beyond all reason. The night of Billy's birth marks
Madeleine's first of many betrayals, and from this point on, she
is on her own. As painful as those scenes are when Anita unfairly
lashes out at her, the most hurtful moments occur when Madeleine
feels entirely ignored.
Billy's father Wilkie is soon replaced
by Lion, a stoned-out ne'er-do-well who keeps Anita sexually
satisfied. Home life is anything but traditional: Madeleine might
as easily happen upon the two making love as on an acid trip.
Lion's untimely, or timely, death by an overdose leaves Anita
furious. Her next live-in, Ellery, a psychiatrist, offers
Madeleine stability and encouragement, until Anita's high-wire
act becomes too much even for him. The matricide (occurring just
days before Madeleine is scheduled to leave for college) follows
soon after Ellery's departure.
Madeleine, fractured by her mother, has
nonetheless inherited Anita's intelligence and sexual neediness,
but unlike Anita, is thoughtful and giving. Toward the novel's
conclusion and meditating on her own affair with Ellery's son,
Madeleine muses:
"And then we made love some more. I
figure it's okay to call it making love because it isn't the same
as being in it, which is about your brain, as far as I can
understand. If you're not in love, your body might feel the same
as if you were, but your brain's out there in the cold, a little
orphan, watching the warm room with the books and fireplace
through a window."
If Judith Rossner's sympathetic
portrayal of Madeleine Stern ends ambiguously, the disquiet
suggests that Madeleine's childhood has forever left her watching
from outside in the cold. -- Lisa C. Hickman
Honey, Mud, Maggots, and Other Medical Marvels
The Science Behind Folk Remedies and Old Wives' Tales
By Robert and Michele Root-Bernstein
Houghton Mifflin, 258 pp., $24
MAGGOTS AND LEECHES can be good for you.
Eating dirt may take away the fatal effects of poison. The Dark
Ages technique of bloodletting may not be that bad after all. And
honey and sugar extracts can be much more than food additives.
Traditional and alternative medicines are making a comeback
asserts Robert and Michele Root-Bernstein in their new,
excessively titled book, Honey, Mud, Maggots, and Other
Medical Marvels: The Science Behind Folk Remedies and Old Wives'
Tales.
That's a fairly commonplace statement,
and if it were the only assertion of the Root-Bernsteins, the
book probably would not be worth reading. The two authors,
however, put alternative medicine into a context that other
writers have not by placing the whole of medicine on a historical
timeline. Through this approach we learn that medical progress
has not always followed a straightforward line toward modern
science. Rather, it's been a convoluted, twisting line in which
natural cures to ailments gain and lose credibility. Our
contemporary history is seeing a resurgence in some alternative
approaches to medicine because the more technical, synthetic
solutions seem to be losing ground, especially as more virulent
strains of viruses successfully resist antibiotics.
The book is written in ordinary language
for the average reader and scrupulously avoids overly
sophisticated explanations about why leeches can help
bloodclotting and fly larvae -- yes, maggots -- can clean a
severe wound. By thus reaching for a wider audience, the authors
are, in effect, helping to fuel the revolution in which doctors
and the standard practices are healthily questioned by a
better-informed public.
The authors aren't a pair of
forest-dwelling Druids calling for the banishment of scientific
laboratories, however. Robert Root-Bernstein is a physiology
professor at Michigan State University and a former research
associate of Jonas Salk, discoverer of the polio vaccine. Michele
Root-Bernstein is an accomplished writer of history. The two
deserve credit for maintaining an objective perspective even as
they show how the established medical community has for too long
been blind to the many cures hidden within old wives' tales. They
also admit to how medical research has often taken nature's
amazing cures and improved upon them. Rolaids and Mylanta contain
minerals one can indeed get by eating clay, but it's a
potentially dangerous practice still observed in some parts of
the United States and the rest of the world.
Beyond their historical examples and
anecdotes, the Root-Bernsteins conclude by calling for a more
systematic study of folk remedies, an approach once reserved for
science's more sophisticated solutions to illness. They make a
cogent argument in their sensible book. -- Phil Campbell
The File: A Personal History
By Timothy Garton Ash
Random House, 256 pp., $23
IN 1989, AS THE BERLIN WALL CAME
tumbling down, so too did the towering mountain of secrets
concealing East Germany's Cold War past. And as Oxford historian
and journalist Timothy Garton Ash was to soon find out,
everything he ever heard about the notorious, prying eyes of the
East German secret police, or Stasi, did not even begin to
scratch the surface.
In the first chapter of The File: A
Personal History, we find Garton Ash getting ready to peer
into his own buff-colored, two-inch-thick dossier kept by the
Stasi. Because "about one out of every fifty adult East
Germans had a direct connection with the secret police," the
reunified German government set up the Gauck Authority (named
after the "forceful but eloquent East German priest who
heads it") to deal with the hoards of curious people wanting
to know what the Stasi knew about them. Garton Ash writes that
while some files uncover devastating secrets of betrayal, his
fellow students at Humboldt University in East Germany would just
die to have a chance to boast to their girlfriends that they were
the subject of one of these sexy, mysterious files. "No one
ever says, 'I'm sure they didn't have one on me.' One could
describe the syndrome in Freudian terms: file envy."
So thanks to Germany's sunshine laws,
Garton Ash gets to turn the tables and spy on the Stasi, which
recorded his "bourgeois-liberal attitude and no commitment
to the working class" to the color of the purse that a
now-forgotten girlfriend carried on a date (dark brown). But
while the file unmasks friends and lovers as informers and
reconstructs a rather interesting personal history, the author
again turns the tables and uses his file to unmask the mystery of
the East German secret police and the secret lifestyle it forced
many of its citizens to live. He searches for answers to
questions, such as, "What is it that makes one person a
resistance fighter and another a faithful servant of a
dictatorship -- this man a Stauffenberg, that a Speer."
And this philosophical question is the
essence of Garton Ash's search. He goes back to interview and
confront those who informed on him and the officers who watched
his every move -- not to scold or get revenge, but to understand
why they did what they did.
In fact, he is surprisingly forgiving of
those who snitched and almost sympathetic in understanding the
Stasi's role. After interviewing the man who was head of the
division in charge of watching him, for example, Garton Ash
describes the officer as a "good man ... intelligent and
fundamentally decent."
More than a unique perspective on the
secret world behind East Germany's side of the wall, The File is
a marvelous study of human nature. What does make one
person a traitor and another a patriot? The answer is not so
black and white, good or bad. And Timothy Garton Ash does a great
job looking back at this intrusive East German system of spying
without once sounding triumphant or judgmental. -- Tanuja
Surpuriya
The Confederate War
By Gary W. Gallagher
Harvard University Press, 210 pp., $23
LIKE ANY OTHER MAJOR HUMAN event, the
American Civil War and its attendant cataclysms have been
subjected over time to this or that wave of historical
revisionism. Had the South chosen to wage a 20th-century-style
guerilla war, it might well have earned a victory, it is said.
The consciousness of slavery bore down Southern will, and
loyalties to region and state undermined the concept of
nationhood, it is also argued. Even had final defeat on the
battlefield not sealed the issue, the Confederacy was destined to
erode from within.
These and other emergent theories of the
South's defeat in the conflict that raged from 1861 to 1865 are
given their comeuppance in Gary W. Gallagher's succinctly written
and formidably sourced and illustrated The Confederate War.
Gallagher, a professor of American history at Pennsylvania State
University, also shatters some of the kindlier myths about the
war that have settled into the American popular consciousness:
most notably, that Robert E. Lee, the military genius who
accounted for the South's most stirring victories, was an
opponent of slavery and friend of the Union who took up arms
merely because of his attachment to his native state of Virginia.
General Lee did indeed advocate partial
emancipation and arming of the freed slaves toward the end of the
war, Gallagher demonstrates, but solely as stratagems to bolster
the South's declining military strength. And Marse Robert, whose
Army of Northern Virginia drew its cadres from throughout the 13
seceding states, was clearly on record as espousing a Southern
nationhood.
That such a nationhood was well on its
way to creation and was prevented not by internal disintegration
but solely by the cumulative weight of Northern military and
industrial might is Gallagher's major argument. He quotes with
approbation the Confederate colonel Charles S. Wainwright:
"As it is, the rebellion has been worn out rather than
suppressed." And Gallagher adds in his own voice: "No
other white Americans have lost such a huge percentage of their
young men killed and maimed, or have had to withstand such
intense pressures for so long."
The culture that mustered such heroic
resolve did so, however, to perpetuate "a slave-based social
system that guaranteed white control over the black people who
made up 40 percent of the population." And there is not much
of the Glorious in the Lost Cause fanaticism of one Ann Devereux
Edmonston, a representative diarist whose war-cry was
"Freedom for whites, slavery for negroes" because
"God has so ordained it." (North Carolinian Edmonston
was such a fire-eater that she first scorned Lee -- whose
penchant for the attack would today be regarded as, to say the
least, pro-active -- as an altogether "too timid"
warrior.)
Gallagher's subtitle is How Popular
Will, Nationalism, and Military Strategy Could Not Stave Off
Defeat, and that's pretty much the size of it. Zeal,
patriotism, valor, and even President Jefferson Davis'
insufficiently praised military strategy of launching periodic
offensives from within a defensive ring: All these pluses could
not -- in the absence of foreign intervention -- offset the
overwhelming Northern superiority in men and materiel.
Gallagher's final statement is
provocative to the point of being unsettling: "It defies
modern understanding that any people -- especially one in which
nonslaveholding yeomen formed a solid majority -- would pour
energy and resources into a fight profoundly tainted by the
institution of slavery. Yet the Confederate people did so. Until
historians can explain more fully why they did, the story of the
Civil War will remain woefully incomplete." -- Jackson
Baker
Why Things Bite Back
Technology and the Revenge of Unintended Consequences
By Edward Tenner
Vintage, 431 pp., $13 (paper)
APPARENTLY, WE HUMANS CAN'T do anything
right. Oh, we think we're clever, but it turns out that all of
our dazzling inventions and discoveries have unforeseen negative
consequences. Technology designed to make our lives run more
smoothly has in fact only made things more complicated.
In Why Things Bite Back,
Princeton-based science historian Edward Tenner describes
hundreds of examples of this phenomenon in almost every field of
endeavor, from medicine (overuse of antibiotics creates
drug-resistant strains of bacteria) to agriculture
(super-vigorous plants and animals introduced to benefit us --
e.g., kudzu -- turn out to be noxious pests) to computers
(expected gains in productivity are cancelled out by the amount
of time and resources we spend upgrading and learning new systems
and dealing with glitches; also, our complete dependence on
computers means we're really up a creek when the system crashes)
to sports (improved high-tech equipment gives athletes the
overconfidence to take greater risks, leading to more injuries)
to environment (better flood-control measures have encouraged
more people to live in flood-prone areas, making natural
disasters more costly).
The list goes on and on, as does
Tenner's litany of our errors. His supply of admittedly
fascinating anecdotes seems endless. Basically, that's what this
book is: a meticulously researched, carefully footnoted
collection of anecdotes.
What's missing is analysis. Where is the
"why" in Why Things Bite Back? Why don't we do a
better job of forecasting the implications of scientific
discoveries? Why can't we learn to look at all the
possible effects of an invention, rather than just the effect we
desire?
Tenner offers no real answers. He
maintains that we can't really predict unfortunate outcomes -- we
can only deal with them after the fact. The problem, he says, is
not so much with machines but with cultural preferences; we're so
bent on achieving a certain standard of living that we're willing
to accept trade-offs. But the price we pay, according to Tenner,
is a need for constant vigilance. We cannot eliminate
"revenge effects"; we can only try our best to keep
them at bay.
It's a sobering thought, and a humbling
book. For every step forward our ingenuity takes us, our lack of
foresight takes us one back. -- Debbie Gilbert
It's a Slippery Slope
By Spalding Gray
Noonday Press, 105 pp., $10 (paper)
THERE'S NOTHING LIKE A GOOD mid-life
crisis to get the testosterone levels into the red zone. We take
up skydiving, ice climbing, fly fishing, Tai Chi, night classes
for a real estate license, anything that might bridge the chasm
between who we thought we were and who we have become, between
where we thought we were going and where we ended up. Leave it to
Spalding Gray. When his life goes down in flames at 52, it leaves
the longest contrail, cuts the widest swath, lands with the
biggest explosion, and shatters the most lives. And he makes
certain everyone knows about it. Punch his name into an Internet
search engine, and you'll get more hits than a ironwood bong at a
Joe Cocker concert. But the guy can flat-out tell a story.
It's a Slippery Slope is what you
would expect from a guy -- and, lest we forget, a well-known,
talented guy -- ricocheting among love, lust, loss, betrayal,
joy, and despair at the speed of life. It is provocative,
irritating, sentimental, cynical, from a Boy Scout and the
Antichrist. Gray simply snaps into his downhill 195 skis, bolts
down the chute, and we're caroming down the mountainside with
him, metaphorically working through his infidelities, his
back-to-back marriages, the death of his father, the birth of his
daughter. Gray's pursuit of himself -- the ultimate chase -- is
relentless, sanguine, manic, the misguided and occasionally
well-intended steps of someone in the throes of an identity
crisis and who is determined not to change.
But It's a Slippery Slope is not
just a book about a particular period in Gray's larger-than-life
life. It is performance art transformed into text, a stage
monologue turned paperback book, and, at some point, a life that
became a stage play with multimedia residuals, the ultimate
pay-per-view. Plato said that the unexamined life wasn't worth
living. Spalding Gray agrees, plus you should pay admission. -- David
Lyons
Keys to the City
Tales of a New York City Locksmith
By Joel Kostman
DK Publishing, 136 pp., $19.95
JOEL KOSTMAN IS A LOCKSMITH in New York
City, a job that entails all the inconveniences and provides none
of the glories awarded to doctors, social workers, and other
on-call professionals. At first, the $45 Kostman earns for
showing up anywhere in the city at a moment's notice, regardless
of weather, traffic, or his own emotional state, hardly seems
worth it -- until, that is, you read one of his short stories.
Then you realize Kostman is doing exactly what he was meant to do
in life: meet people in need, solve their immediate problems, and
write about them.
Kostman's stories are sometimes funny,
mostly insightful, and even touching, and his acute powers of
observation enable him to discern much more about his customers'
personalities than they realize. While replacing deadbolts and
repairing key jams, Kostman often unlocks fears and frustrations.
He empathizes, for example, with a single mother trying to lock
out her abusive husband, listens as a Holocaust survivor reads
him her memoirs, and comforts a demeaning, but pitiful, upscale
divorcee with a compassion only one with his own tale of love
lost could express.
In some of the more lighthearted
stories, Kostman listens to Mozart with five old, naked men,
changes a lock for Bugsy Siegel's doctor, and dresses up in Eddie
Cantor's jacket and tie. In those instances, Kostman thankfully
refrains from the soul-searching and lets the uniqueness of the
experiences shine through.
Kostman is an excellent, slice-of-life
storyteller. His Keys to the City could prompt even the
most mechanically unsavvy student of human nature to dream of
learning to use a Vise-grip and hole saw. -- Jacqueline Marino
Always Outmanned, Always Outgunned
By Walter Mosley
Norton, 208 pp., $23
WHEN A PUBLISHER PROMISES the
introduction of a "bold new character" by a major
author, there's a cynical part of the critical reader that
responds, So what. It's almost too calculating, a tackily obvious
reminder of the fact that, for publishers, all literature is
simply product to be pushed.
So you could be forgiven for coming to
Walter Mosley's latest, Always Outmanned, Always Outgunned,
with some trepidation, since its cover promises "Mosley's
most compelling new character since ... Easy Rawlins."
Mosley achieved fame with Rawlins, the memorable detective of Devil
in a Blue Dress and A Little Yellow Dog, among other
books. Set in 1950s Los Angeles, Mosley's Rawlins novels invested
the mystery form with new life, bringing social realism and
complex characters to the limp old gumshoe genre.
But perhaps Mosley has grown tired of
walking Easy's streets. Enter Socrates Fortlow, the protagonist
of Always Outmanned. Socrates spent 27 years in prison for
killing a young couple. The only reason he wasn't executed,
Socrates believes, is because his victims were black. "They
didn't kill me because I was the best kinda rule-followin'
niggah," Socrates says. "I killed my own people an'
then let myself get caught." He lives in present-day L.A.,
amidst gangs, drugs, riots, and racism too devious and subtle to
register on the ACLU's radar.
Always Outmanned, Always Outgunned
(the title is Socrates' description of the black man's life) is a
series of interconnected short stories featuring Socrates.
Although there is some repetition (Socrates' "rock-breaking
hands" are mentioned in virtually every story), the episodic
effect works to show all sides of Socrates' character. Sometimes
proud, sometimes vindictive, sometimes scared, sometimes
foolhardy, Socrates is a fully realized creation.
Fundamentally, Always Outmanned
is the story of a man's attempt to survive in an indifferent
world. Socrates looks for work at a grocery store, and the layers
of bureaucracy take his simple persistence as a threat. Black
militants see him as, at best, an embarrassment; high-rolling
dope dealers dismiss him as a naive old fool.
Despite his name, Socrates tends to
philosophize with his fists. Still, he constantly works to find
the words to express the roiling emotions in himself. In
"Letter to Theresa," for instance, Socrates writes to a
lover of nearly four decades ago: "I saw you in a dream the
other night and so I wanted to say hay .... You was always asking
when was I going to stop being so crazy. I never said nothing to
that because I didn't want to be lying." The response he
eventually receives is comforting, though not what he'd desired.
The cast of characters in Always
Outmanned is fascinating and revelatory: Darryl, the street
kid whom Socrates desperately wants to keep from becoming a gang
victim -- or member; Iula, who runs a grill housed inside two
school buses welded together; Right Burke, the terminal World War
II vet who asks Socrates for a final act of love.
Socrates is the extraordinary kind of
character who resonates far beyond his age, race, class, and
gender. Always Outmanned, Always Outgunned is urban
fiction at its finest. * -- James Busbee
The Undertaking
Life Studies in the Dismal Trade
By Thomas Lynch
Norton, 199 pp., $23
"EVERY YEAR I BURY A COUPLE hundred
of my townspeople."
So begins this dark gem of a book.
Thomas Lynch is a funeral director by trade, a poet by avocation.
He is the owner of a lyric Irish soul, with an eye for finding
big truths in small-town life. Garrison Keillor with the cornball
whimsy.
The Undertaking is a collection
of essays -- or better said -- literate musings on life, love,
and death. They are things of great beauty and sadness and humor.
Lynch's insights are irrevocably shaped by his profession, his
time spent with "the living and the living who have
died" -- women, children, old men, his own father and mother
-- but he has a true poet's voice. He writes sentences and
paragraphs that will haunt you like a November rain, and you will
welcome the haunting.
In truth, there is little morbidity in
these pages, only the carved-in-stone reality of a life lived
full. Food, drink, travel, literature, death -- all part of the
inevitable passing through; all celebrated in their turn. When it
comes to death and the dismal trade, Lynch doesn't shrink from
the details, but he turns what could be horrific -- a young girl
killed by a headstone thrown from an overpass; the embalming of
his own father -- into prose that touches the heart.
Lynch is actually a widely published
poet, in addition to his duties as the sole undertaker in
Milford, Michigan. He offers one poem in The Undertaking.
I leave you with part of it here:
Such stillness leaves us moving room by
room/rummaging through cupboards and the closetspace/for any
remembrance of our dead lovers,/numbering our losses by the noise
they made/at home -- in basements tinkering with tools/or in
steamy bathrooms where they sang in the shower,/in kitchens where
they labored over stoves/or gossiped over coffee with the
nextdoor neighbor,/in bedrooms where they made their tender
moves;/whenever we miss that division of labor/whereby he washed,
she dried; she dreams, he snores;/he does the storm window, she
does floors;/she nods in the rocker, he dozes on the couch;/he
hammers a thumbnail, she says Ouch!
Buy The Undertaking; read the
whole thing. It won't kill you. -- Bruce VanWyngarden
X20
A Novel Of (Not) Smoking
By Richard Beard
Arcade Publishing, 311 pp., $22.95
TWENTY WISHES GRANTED, 20 dreams come
true, 20 desires effortlessly fulfilled, each and every day.
That's what Gregory Simpson, the son of
a non-smoking Glasgow tobacconist, is up against in this first
novel by Richard Beard. The novel itself is couched as Simpson's
journal, composed of 20 chapters for the first 20 days of going
cold turkey.
The early chapters are choppy and
disjointed -- as Simpson struggles just to keep his hands busy --
until the narrative succumbs to something close to order by the
end. Strains are intertwined as the narrator's ruminations move
in two directions at once, up to the first cigarette and away
from the last. In fact, Simpson, who, we are told, smoked 20 a
day for 10 years (hence the title) as part of a tobacco-company
experiment, rarely lights up on the page as his reflections focus
on his pre- and post-smoking selves. The protagonist's
relationship with cigarettes is thoroughly wrapped up with sex
and death. Sex, because of the reckless Lucy, who took his
virginity in what may or may not have been a bet to entice him to
smoke; and death, because of his namesake uncle, who died an
early death at the hands of the thin white tube.
Along the way, we meet a cast of
characters whose lives are in some way ruled by the lately
maligned weed. There's Julian, a charismatic
university-acquaintance-turned-industry-flack, who ultimately
enlists Simpson as the experimental "Mr. X"; Walter,
the indestructible centenarian, who had his first serious smoke
before a failed firing squad; the miscellaneous members of the
Suicide Club; and Theo, the renegade researcher whose death
sparks Gregory's decision to kick.
The tone is at the same time wistful and
hyperbolic -- tending toward the unreal without fully embracing
hyperreality -- as Simpson's obsession with cigarettes long
precedes his addiction, becoming a symbol of nihilism and
self-hatred long before becoming a habit. While this belies the
banality of how people really get hooked -- and occasionally
risks casting Gregory as an unsympathetic sap -- it allows grand,
and often dead-on, aphorisms on the existential properties of
nicotine, as when Simpson writes in his journal, "It has
been the century's open addiction, the world-wide admission that
breathing by itself is simply not enough."
The principle weakness of the book is
one common among first novels, as the disjointed narrative (even
by the end) often seems less like structure than a calculated
attempt to avoid the bother. X20 is filled with great
writing but falls just short of being great, despite its frequent
incisiveness. * -- Jim Hanas
|


|