 |
Sister Acts
By Hadley Hury
NOVEMBER 17, 1997:
The McCoy Theatre at Rhodes College has a bill of two one-acts by Christopher Durang, a contemporary master of comic angst, on view through November
21st. Sister Mary Ignatius Explains It All For You,
directed by David Jilg, and The Actor's Nightmare,
directed by Gregory K. Krosnes, are playing in repertory with Richard
III (which is directed by Cookie Ewing and ends its run on
the 23rd).
Best known for heady satire, Durang
ranks with Terrence McNally, Wendy Wasserstein, and up-and-coming
Nicki Silver, as one of our era's most cerebral wordsmiths. His
work writhes with witty counter-culture questioning, exotic yet
illuminating allusions, incisive insights, and just-plain-funny
one-liners. It is, perhaps, that Durang has yet to produce a
full-length work that reveals a great theatrical heart that has
kept him from attaining the commercial success of McNally, but
his plays and screenplays are on surer intellectual footing than
Wasserstein's, and they share McNally's wonderful sense of
theatrical verve and Silver's finesse with dark, discomforting
comedy.
It is a pleasure to see
that Sister Mary Ignatius still packs a punch. Although a
few people at the time of its premiere, and in the two decades
since, have denounced the piece as a deeply irreverent exercise
in scurrilous anti-Catholic bigotry, millions more have found it
to be an exhilarating 75-minute exhortation to examine one's
personal and societal relationship to one's spiritual beliefs
regardless of faith or denomination. It is quite possible, if not
indeed likely, for the open-minded to come away from this play
with a few fresh perspectives and considerations of that
ecumenically equal-opportunity conundrum: There can be no faith
without doubt.
Not to say that Durang doesn't have an
apparent axe to grind with his Catholic upbringing and the dogma
and social politics of the church. He does, and he brandishes
that axe with a gleeful abandon that is deceptively hilarious
(his points are actually quite precise and carefully argued).
It's not that he considers nothing sacred, it's just that in
order to know what is, can, or should be so, one has to put
everything on the table. Or rather, in this play, the indomitable
Sister Mary Ignatius puts it all on the table for you -- and
tells you exactly what you will and will not believe. And, by the
end of the piece, any lack of perfect clarity has been dispelled;
for the good Sister has dramatically demonstrated the
consequences for those who have the temerity to persist in
defiant, human imperfection.
Staged in three-quarter round in the intimate McCoy space, Sister Mary places the audience in an urban Catholic school, Our Lady of Perpetual Sorrow. The lights come up on the solitary figure of Sister Mary (community
theatre veteran Carolyn Spratley) as she points out some of the
art-work illuminations of Faith on her classroom walls and --
with the literalness and that sense of hyperbolic smugness that
barely masks the vulnerability of unquestioning fundamentalism --
explains much of human history, the nature of the soul, heaven
and hell, limbo and purgatory, who goes where, who doesn't, and
why, all in about four or five minutes.
When some of her former students show up
for a reunion, they bring a set of tough contemporary issues:
Diane Symonds has experienced rape, abortion, and the long and
painful demise of her beloved mother; Aloysius Benheim is
alcoholic and beats his wife; Philomena Rostovich is a single
mother; Gary Sullivan is gay. These former students also bring
with them a great deal of animosity toward Sister Mary. Whether
they have lost their faith or maintained some semblance of it,
each of them knows he or she was scarred by this teacher's
distorting, perverse -- and, as it is finally revealed -- truly
sadistic authoritarianism. Sister Mary told Philomena she was
stupid and banged her head against the blackboard; she caused
Aloysius regularly to urinate in his pants because she would not
recognize his raised hand in class. She calls Diane a murderer
and tells Gary that, as a sodomite, he is going to go straight to
hell. (She says that there is a master list of those who,
obviously and unarguably, will. It is composed of a wide range of
those whom Sister sees as similar threats to wholesome culture;
it includes Linda Lovelace and Comden & Green.)
Durang's subtext is, of course, that all
the Sister Marys of the world -- whether Catholic, Baptist,
Evangelical, Jewish, Mormon, Muslim, or otherwise -- end up
contorting innocent lives in direct proportion to the degree to
which they have repressed their own spiritual vulnerability and
legitimate questions of faith with the false security of
fundamentalism and moral presumption. Some people escape into
fundamentalism to abnegate the responsibility of personal
conscience. Mary Ignatius is that even more horrifying
combination of cynical absolutism ("Well, there's the Bible
and then there are those things that one priest just said to
another priest and then it was said to another priest and
....") and megalomania ("How could you people have
turned out like this?! Wasn't I your teacher?")
Durang underscores his points with two
theatrical devices that work quite effectively. One is to have a
sweetly innocent 7-year-old boy, one of her current students,
come in now and then at Sister's beck and call to bring her a
glass of water or recite bits of catechism. There is a bracing
dramatic dissonance between our notion of a loving, conscientious
teacher, helping to form a young life, and the interaction that
unfolds between this innocent child and what is slowly being
revealed as an insidious agent of corruption. And the bad
emotional and ideological chemistry of the confrontation between
nun and former students ends in an unexpected conflagration that
sends the audience out of the theatre with the play's big
open-ended questions hailing down like hot ash.
The cast is good. Spratley opts for a
smoother, more complacent Sister Mary than is sometimes the case.
Many actors -- including Estelle Parsons, in her acclaimed New
York performance -- have projected more of the woman's
dangerously repressed self-doubt and her volatile, hateful,
reactionism. But Spratley's rendition, even if it loses some of
the threat that kicks the dark satire up another level into true
dramatic shock, interestingly combines the sinister with the
serene. As her elementary-school student, young Carter Jones is
everything he should be to make the audience want to rush onto
the stage and whisk him away from the monster's clutches. He
stands erect and is respectful, charming, and shiny-haired; his
rote pieces, delivered in a flutey, well-spoken voice, offer up
all the vulnerability of innocence the play needs for its
provocative dramatic contrasts.
Pete Montgomery as Aloysius, Matthew J.
Nelson as Gary, and DeNae Winesette as Philomena all handle their
relatively small roles well.
As Diane, Lindsey Patrick is excellent.
She gives the young woman's tale of woe a heartbreaking
immediacy. Spent from the ravages of her life, Diane seeks, in a
final stab at definition, to convert hopelessness and her
subsequent loss of faith into anger and retaliation. She might be
able to forgive Sister Mary for the venial sin of cruelty. But
she considers it a mortal sin that anyone should willfully
mislead a child into believing that human life has strict order
and facile moral categories. Durang's Sister Mary Ignatius
Explains It All For You uses its dark comic power to examine
the difference between honoring the innocence of childhood and
imposing a sense of fearful security that ill-equips the young
for building a personal conscience and for wrestling with moral
questions when reality rears its sometimes ugly head.
THE STAR OF THE SECOND piece on the
bill, Durang's brief and funny The Actor's Nightmare, is
Rhodes student Wes Meador. He takes on his tour-de-force role as
an actor facing the ultimate dread of not knowing what play
he's in with terrific panache. Meador is a sophomore, but he
navigates with finesse the vocal and physical rigors of this
showy role.
His trauma is fleshed out by fellow
student cast members Summer Oakley, Jill Peterfeso, Christine
Callsen, and Andrew Sullivan. They flit in and out, dragging the
hapless actor into fragments of Hamlet here, snatches of
Noel Coward or Samuel Beckett there. Whether feverishly trying to
brush up his Shakespeare, suddenly having to downshift into the
stilted pauses of mid-century existentialism, or trying to jump
elegantly into the precise languors of the Master, Meador gives
the dreaming actor's predicament the mania it needs to keep this
theatrical bagatelle spinning.
What is dream? What is reality? Whose
dream is it? Should we be concerned with deciphering all of
Durang's allusions? Is this an actor, or is it Everyman trying to
live Life?
Who cares? The piece whirls by in
perhaps less than a half-hour, and watching how elegantly Meador
squirms makes it a very merry nightmare indeed.
|


|