|
|
![]() |
|
By Jerry Renshaw DECEMBER 29, 1997: Show of hands, please; how many of you have heard of director Edward D. Wood, Jr.? Just as I thought, almost everyone. Chances are you're familiar with him because some snide, condescending movie critic once deemed him "the world's worst director" and called Plan 9 from Outer Space the world's worst movie. Well, those cinematic stuffed shirts just haven't looked hard enough. Think about it: Sure, Glen or Glenda, Wood's explication of his cross-dressing tendencies, is technically rather inept, stiffly acted, perplexing, and obtuse. It's also a raw slice of Wood's soul served up on a celluloid platter, his inner weirdness (which isn't really all that weird) laid bare for all the world to poke fun at. If Glen or Glenda were released today, by, say, the guy who did Clerks, those same dang cineasthetes would be slobbering all over their suede-elbowed tweed jackets and getting into wrestling matches to see who'd be the first to call it "a brilliant, visionary work," "a painfully honest indie effort," "a naïve but ingenious look at the transvestism phenomenon," etc. etc. What the hell do critics know, anyway? What comprises a "bad" movie?
Bert I. Gordon's stock in trade was oversized monsters (Mr. B.I.G. -- get it?).One of his early successes was The Beginning of the End, the story of a plague of atomic-mutation giant grasshoppers attacking Illinois and eventually winding up in downtown Chicago, with our man Peter Graves again saving the day. Follow-ups included l957's The Amazing Colossal Man, with a nuclear-blast witness (Glenn Langan) growing to 50' tall, wrapping a giant diaper around himself and eventually going on a rampage in Las Vegas (which in turn spawned a sequel, War of the Colossal Beast). Another Bert cheeze-fest is Village of the Giants, a '65 feature wherein a gang of delinquent teens (led by Beau Bridges ) grows to 50' or so and terrorizes a town before being thwarted by Johnny (The Rifleman) Crawford, Tommy Kirk, and little Ronnie Howard (also keep an eye out for Toni Basil!). Probably best known, though, is his Seventies excursion into H.G. Wells territory, Food of the Gods, the story of all kinds of animals (but especially rats) growing to huge proportions after eating some special growth vittles. This one does show up on TV pretty often and has a lot better SFX than most of Gordon's efforts, so keep an eye out for it. Worth a mention here is the awful Eighties sequel (not directed by Gordon), Food of the Gods II, easily one of the most careless productions you'll see, with the boom mike coming into frame so often it deserves to be in the credits ("Boom Mike as... Himself!"). Al Adamson brought out a string of impoverished movies in the Sixties that definitely are worth seeing for their high school-level acting and dime store special effects. Adamson managed to regularly rope in such talent as John Carradine and Adamson's buddy Rusty Tamblyn (at his most drug-addled nadir). Horror of the Blood Monsters is a good Al Adamson primer; a confused, Filipino/Adamson patchwork involving giant lobsters, flying bat-winged midgets, cavemen, and astronauts, featuring Carradine in a sort of figurehead role.
Texan Larry Buchanan was responsible for a rash of made-for-TV remakes of Fifties horror movies that, due to copyright problems, are nearly impossible to see anymore. However, if you do get a chance to see the lumpy green rubber-suited monster with bulging ping-pong ball eyes and a visible zipper up the back that graced such efforts as Zontar, Thing From Venus, It's Alive, and Creature of Destruction you won't likely forget it. Buchanan, always a believer in pinching a penny until Abe Lincoln's beard is all lathered up with sweat, put the same miscreant mutant in all three films. Best bet is to keep an eye on TV listings, since they do surface now and then. Probably the best-known film of his (and one of the all-time great titles) is Mars Needs Women, with Disney vet Tommy Kirk, Yvonne (Batgirl) Craig, and a bunch of romantic Martians wearing wetsuits with antennae'd headphones and looking for a little lovin' on that crazy planet Earth.
So, class... here's your assignment, if you dare. It's ridiculously easy to belittle and beat up on these directors and all of these movies, until you stop and consider whether the most basic intent of film is to entertain. If you think about it from that angle, something like The Amazing Colossal Man is a way better buy for your video dollar than slick, calculated Nineties Hollywood mega-turds like Independence Day. Let the film professors snort; let the average moviegoer scoff; let all the Siskels, Eberts and pointy-headed Medveds of the world rave over Mr. Holland's Opus. Who's watching the movies, and who's the final judge... them, or you?
|
![]() |
||||
|
Film & TV: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
![]() |
© 1995-99 DesertNet, LLC . Austin Chronicle . Info Booth . Powered by Dispatch |
|